Just when I was starting to get excited about the new cast of Dancing With the Stars, the DNC convention coverage on C-SPAN converged with my life as a Human Resources blogger.
Instead of focusing on Kim Kardashian and other celebrity gossip, I feel compelled to reprint Lily Ledbetter’s remarks to the DNC convention delegates.
Good evening. Many of you are probably asking: Who is that grandmother from Alabama at the podium? I can assure you, nobody is more surprised, or humbled, than I am. I’m here to talk about America’s commitment to fairness and equality, and how people like me — and like you — suffer when that commitment is betrayed.
How fitting that I speak to you on Women’s Equality Day, when we celebrate ratification of the amendment that gave women the right to vote. Even as we celebrate, let’s also remind ourselves: the fight for equality is not over. I know that from personal experience. I was a trailblazer when I went to work as a female supervisor at a Goodyear tire plant in Gadsden, Alabama.
My job demanded a lot, and I gave it 100 percent. I kept up with every one of my male co-workers. But toward the end of my 19 years at Goodyear, I began to suspect that I wasn’t getting paid as much as men doing the same job. An anonymous note in my mailbox confirmed that I was right. Despite praising me for my work, Goodyear gave me smaller raises than my male co-managers, over and over.
Those differences affected my family’s quality of life then, and they affect my retirement now. When I discovered the injustice, I thought about moving on. But in the end, I couldn’t ignore the discrimination. So I went to court. A jury agreed with me. They found that my employer had violated the law and awarded me what I was owed.
I hoped the verdict would make my company feel the sting, learn a lesson and never again treat women unfairly. But they appealed, all the way to the Supreme Court, and in a 5-to-4 decision our highest court sided with big business. They said I should have filed my complaint within six months of Goodyear’s first decision to pay me less, even though I didn’t know that’s what they were doing.
In dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote that the ruling made no sense in the real world. She was right. The House of Representatives passed a bill that would make sure what was done to me couldn’t happen again. But when it got to the Senate, enough Republicans opposed it to prevent a vote.
We can’t afford more of the same votes that deny women their equal rights. Barack Obama is on our side. He is fighting to fix this terrible ruling, and as president, he has promised to appoint justices who will enforce laws that protect everyday people like me. But this isn’t a Democratic or a Republican issue. It’s a fairness issue. And fortunately, there are some Republicans — and a lot of Democrats — who are on our side.
My case is over. I will never receive the pay I deserve. But there will be a far richer reward if we secure fair pay. For our children and grandchildren, so that no one will ever again experience the discrimination that I did. Equal pay for equal work is a fundamental American principle. We need leaders in this country who will fight for it. With all of us working together, we can have the change we need and the opportunity we all deserve.
Thank you.
Kind of interesting to hear the Paycheck Fairness Act described in such simple language by the woman who started it all.



{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }
Did she ask for bigger raises?
I didn’t see her and I’m so glad you published this. She is awesome, and she totally put it in terms any of us, HR or not, can get behind.
@willy I left out the part where she fist-bumped Hillary Rodham Clinton and said, “Willy Franzen, put a sock in it.”
@FrannyO This is the line that gets me. They said I should have filed my complaint within six months of Goodyear
This was one of the Court’s worst decisions ever or as Laurie would say — Worst. Decisions. Ever. It totally flies in the face of reason and logic.
People who say it doesn’t matter who we elect president should think twice because the next prez could appoint 1-3 new justices. Do you want more Ledbetter-type decisions? (Also see Kelo v. City of New London if you want to have your socks blown off by what other craziness this current Court has done).
@Bryan I would totally say Worst. Decision. Ever. You know me so well! I would also say SUPREME COURT: UR DOIN IT WRONG. I will say that the New London ruling benefited my pformer employer, so uh, I’ll just remain neutral on that court ruling.
Thanks for posting this. I tuned in too late to catch it. The Dems and Hillary have done an amazing job keeping people focused on this issue. They have been talking about 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling. Until that thing is shattered and gone, we need to keep hearing about Lily and others that have been wronged.
I get so angry when I look at my daughters and think they will have to work harder to receive the same advantages I did – or that my sons will receive.
Thanks for clueing me in on this – I arrived late to the telecast and missed it. But I’ll be writing Goodyear a letter to let them know that they may have won the case, but they’ve lost my business and the business of everyone I know. Too bad – I love their blimp.
@George She was sandwiched between all sorts of speeches & tributes, but I caught her on CSPAN. She is a true American hero.
@Robyn You are so great. I think Goodyear needs to take a hit in the pocketbook from 52% of American consumers.
I have to comment on the fact that a lot of you guys are all blaming the Supreme Court for this when it is the law and how it was written you have a problem with. The whole basis of the appeal was to decide if the very fact of issuing a paycheck based on prior decisions that were descriminatory demonstrated another act of descrimination. Which if you carry out to the Nth degree I believe would not be good policy, essentially creating no statute of limitations on lawsuits of this type. Also, Performance evaluations were the root of the descriminatory behavior (as decided in the court of appeals). The 180 day window may very well be unfair, but that is what the law says. Even in the opinion, the prevailing Justices mentioned that the 180 day time limit to report was probably too compressed. The law is pretty specific, if you want to change it go ahead. But the court is not the place to do it. I hate to let my originalist legal views show too much but, I still have a little faith in democracy.
@Dan – Right on for identifying the real issue. The SCOTUS isn’t supposed to legislate, it’s supposed to interpret.
Sorry Laurie, but I spit the sock…
Recommended reading from my days studying negotiation theory:
http://books.google.com/books?id=8V2I3SC_zmgC&dq=women+don‘t+ask+for+raises&pg=PP1&ots=f2om6NnEmS&sig=LWWPR656MImsXwbKNSDKX3Xn-pg&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result
Also, basing your argument on anecdotal evidence doesn’t give it much merit. Maybe in this case there was a egregious pay discrimination, but does that mean that it’s really a major problem? What does the data say when you control for a variety of factors? I really don’t know, that’s why I’m asking.
@Dan UR right about legislation in the sense that it’s all effed up. UR also right that congress is a legislative body. I still think SCOTUS muffed up the interpretation of the law.
@Willy 1) I’ll blame women for pay inequity once I’m 100% sure that corporations are working hard to remove the avg 22 cent pay differential between women & men. 2) You can’t negotiate at retail & small businesses (where pay inequity is so pervasive) in the same way that you can negotiate in Fortune 500 companies.
@Laurie – Pay differential doesn’t equal discrimination. Maybe they shouldn’t be working hard to remove it. Maybe it’s a factor of decisions that women make in their careers. Maybe it’s not.
You’re right, you can’t negotiate directly, but you can negotiate with your feet. Maybe men are more likely to leave (no, I didn’t mean that) and look for better opportunities. Once again, I don’t know, but the answer isn’t always to blame discrimination.
@Willy Dude, yr a white guy. Can I blame you? Because that will work fine by me.
OH WILLY.
@Jenn I’m a fan, if only because Willy knows how to fist bump with self-deprecating irony.